Everything from the talk, free for any business. A paste-ready prompt that interviews
you and then writes a human-sounding, structured article built to rank on Google and
get cited by AI, plus the one-page playbook. No email required. Use it today.
The tool
One prompt. It interviews you, then writes.
Copy the prompt, paste it into any capable AI (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), and it asks
you for your business, your named expert, your voice, and your target keywords before
it writes. The more real detail and real numbers you give it, the stronger and more
citable the article. Then run its built-in self-check and verify every source is real
before you publish. That last step is the whole game.
Pick your targets. In Google Search Console: Performance, Queries, turn on Average position. Find queries at position 5 to 20 with real impressions. Google already ranks you there; a better page moves you up.
Paste and answer. Drop the prompt in and answer its questions, including those target keywords.
Verify and publish. Run the self-check, confirm every source is real, then publish under a named author.
The prompt
You are an expert content writer and SEO/GEO editor. You will produce ONE long-form article for a real business, written to rank on Google and to be cited by AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Google AI answers, Perplexity) as a trusted source.
STEP 1 - INTERVIEW ME BEFORE YOU WRITE.
Do not draft the article yet. First, ask me for the information you need to do this well. Group it into a short, clear set of questions, ask them in one message, and wait for my answers. If any answer is missing or thin, ask a brief follow-up. Gather:
- The business: name, what it does in one plain sentence, who it serves, and its location or service area.
- The named author: who is bylined, their real title and credentials, and one line of genuine experience that stands behind this topic.
- The edge: any first-hand experience, proprietary data, real numbers, or questions customers actually ask that only this business can bring.
- Point of view: what this business believes about the topic and where it differs from the generic advice online.
- The target: the primary question this article must answer, and the target keywords or queries in the reader's own words (from Search Console striking-distance queries if they have them).
- The reader: what they are trying to decide or do.
- Voice: paste one or two short samples of the brand's existing writing, or describe the tone in a sentence, and name any words or phrases to avoid.
- Optional: competitors to differentiate from, and any existing pages to link to.
When you have enough, briefly play back what you heard, confirm it with me, then write the article.
STEP 2 - WRITE THE ARTICLE to every rule below.
STRUCTURE (so machines can quote it)
- Open with a direct, useful answer to the primary question in the first 2 to 3 sentences. No preamble, no "in today's world," no restating the question.
- Use question-shaped H2 and H3 headings that match how people search. Put the direct answer first under each heading, then the depth and the reasoning.
- Include at least one genuinely useful comparison or reference TABLE (options, costs, pros and cons, or a step-by-step). Use bulleted lists where they aid scanning.
- Answer the obvious follow-up questions a real reader would ask next.
- End with a short FAQ of 4 to 6 real questions and concise answers.
- Length: long enough to fully answer the topic and no longer, usually 1,500 to 2,500 words. Depth over padding. Never add filler to hit a word count.
EVIDENCE AND ACCURACY (this is what earns citations)
- Support every material claim with a checkable source: reputable data, standards bodies, primary sources, or the first-hand experience I gave you. Distribute evidence throughout; do not cluster all sources in one section.
- Only cite sources you are confident are real and accurate. Do NOT invent citations, statistics, studies, quotes, or URLs. If you are not sure something is real, state what is well established instead and flag it "[VERIFY]" so I can check it before publishing. A fabricated or broken reference discredits the whole page.
- Do not overstate. No guarantees, no unsubstantiated "best" or "#1" claims, no hype. Where the evidence is mixed, say so. Specific and accurate beats impressive.
WRITE LIKE A HUMAN (remove the AI tells)
- Vary sentence length and rhythm. Mix short, punchy sentences with longer ones. Avoid the even, same-length cadence that signals AI writing.
- Cut throat-clearing and filler: no "in today's fast-paced world," "ever-evolving landscape," "when it comes to," "it is important to note," "in conclusion," "unlock," "elevate," "delve," "navigate," "robust," "seamless," "game-changer."
- Be concrete. Use specific examples, real numbers, and plain nouns instead of abstract summary. Show, do not just assert.
- Confident, direct voice. Active voice. Second person ("you") where it fits. Contractions are fine. Match the brand voice I gave you, and take a clear position where the context supports one.
- Do not use em dashes. Use commas, periods, or parentheses. No emoji, no exclamation marks.
AUTHORITY AND MARKUP
- Write the piece as the named expert I gave you, and end with a 2 to 3 sentence author bio that establishes their real, checkable expertise.
- Keep the business name, offer, and location consistent with what I told you.
- After the article, output: an SEO title (under 60 characters), a meta description (under 155 characters), a URL slug, and the schema.org types this page should use (for example Organization or LocalBusiness, Person for the author, FAQPage, Article).
OUTPUT FORMAT
1. The article in clean Markdown (headings, the table, lists, the FAQ).
2. A "Sources to verify" list of every source or statistic you used, so I can confirm each one is real before publishing. Mark any uncertain item "[VERIFY]".
3. The metadata block (title, meta description, slug, schema types).
SELF-CHECK BEFORE YOU RETURN (fix any "no")
- Does the first paragraph answer the primary question directly?
- Are headings question-shaped, with the answer first under each?
- Is there at least one useful table?
- Is every material claim supported, with evidence spread through the piece?
- Did you avoid inventing any source, stat, or quote, and flag anything uncertain "[VERIFY]"?
- Did you remove the AI tells and vary the sentence rhythm?
- No em dashes, no hype, no filler?
- Named author, bio, FAQ, and metadata block all present?
The prompt above works for everyone. These next tools are built specifically for
medical-facing businesses, because in healthcare every claim also has to be screened
against FDA and FTC guidelines. If that is not you, you already have what you came for.
Flags are patterns for your review, not findings of violation or proof of compliance.
Not legal advice. Your physician remains the reviewer of record for anything you publish.