Customer #0 disclosure. Primal Mountain Medical is owned and operated by Authoritize's founder. PMM was the design partner during platform development. We disclose this rather than hide it. Every number on this page is real, pulled from PMM's live production stack.

Case Study · Hormone Replacement & Peptide Therapy · Mountain West
Primal Mountain MedicalCustomer #0 · Physician-led hormone optimization, Mountain West
Primal Mountain Medical, a physician-led hormone replacement and peptide therapy practice in the Mountain West, built its growth on paid ads until Meta and Google's 2025 health and wellness policy changes broke that playbook overnight. Authoritize replaced the marketing site and rebuilt the content engine. In a 60-day window (March 16 to May 12, 2026), conversion events grew +97% (100 to 197 per month), organic Google sessions grew 6×, and page-1 keyword rankings expanded from 21 to 103. The data shows what happens when paid acquisition gets traded for an owned, compounding content asset.
Primal Mountain Medical · 60-day results · March 16 to May 12, 2026
Every number is queryable in the live dashboard Authoritize installed and PMM owns. No black-box reporting.
+97%
Conversion events
100/mo → 197/mo
Form fills, bookings, and contact submissions. Traffic grew 52%, the funnel got more efficient.
6×
Organic sessions
Unpredictable → Peak so far
Bounce rate fell from 52% to 24.8%, less than half the 50 to 60% industry norm for medical sites.
+390%
Page-1 Google rankings
21 keywords → 103 keywords
Top-3 rankings climbed from 14 to 47. "TRT near me" reached position 6.
−62%
Real-user load time
2,818 ms → 1,079 ms
Cloudflare RUM, actual visitor sessions, not synthetic tests. Mobile Performance score went 64 to 95.8.
60 days
Compounding lift, in three stages
Day 0 → Day 1 → month 1 → ~day 45
Technical SEO lift on launch day. Organic traffic climbing through month 1. Keyword rankings kicking in around day 45. Window: March 16 to May 12, 2026.
Before / After · 60 days
Conversion events/mo
Conversion rate
Weekly organic sessions
Page-1 keywords
Top-3 rankings
Real-user load time
Mobile Perf. score
Bounce rate
Lighthouse SEO score
Lighthouse Accessibility
Customer #0 disclosure
Primal Mountain Medical is owned and operated by Jason Skeesick, also the sole founder of Authoritize. PMM was the design partner during platform development, which is why the data is this granular: every metric here comes from the same production stack our other clients deploy. We disclose this rather than hide it.
Data sources
- Google Search Console, rankings & impressions
- Google Analytics 4, traffic & sessions
- Cloudflare RUM, real-user load time
- Microsoft Clarity, conversion events
- Google Lighthouse, performance scores
- Neon PostgreSQL, daily snapshot database
Results are from a single client engagement over 60 days. Individual results will vary based on starting site condition, market, sub-vertical, and competitive landscape.
Common questions about this case study
What results did Primal Mountain Medical see in 60 days with Authoritize?
In a 60-day window (March 16 to May 12, 2026), conversion events grew +97% (from 100 to 197 per month), organic Google sessions grew 6×, page-1 keyword rankings expanded from 21 to 103 (+390%), top-3 rankings climbed from 14 to 47, real-user load time dropped 62% (from 2,818ms to 1,079ms), Mobile Performance score went from 64 to 95.8, Lighthouse SEO went from 64 to 99, Lighthouse Accessibility went from 76 to 100, and bounce rate fell from 52% to 24.8%, less than half the 50 to 60% medical industry norm.
Why is Primal Mountain Medical labeled Customer #0?
Primal Mountain Medical is owned and operated by Authoritize's founder, Jason Skeesick. PMM was the design partner during Authoritize platform development and the first practice to deploy the full stack in production. The relationship is disclosed in a banner and sidebar on this page because the production data is the most rigorous proof of what the platform does.
Why did paid ads stop working for Primal Mountain Medical in 2025?
Both Meta and Google rewrote the rules for health and wellness advertisers in 2025. Meta's Andromeda update replaced granular targeting with a black-box optimization system, and health verticals lost more signal than any other category. Previously profitable campaigns nosedived. Server-side attribution rebuilds didn't restore performance because the ad platforms were routing the budget to a measurably lower-quality lead pool.
Why does Authoritize track popular health podcasts?
Major health podcasts like Huberman Lab, Peter Attia's Drive, and Rich Roll create huge spikes in search demand the moment an episode drops. Within hours, millions of listeners are Googling phrases from the episode. Authoritize monitors these high-velocity content sources so clients can publish a fully-researched, physician-vetted, citation-backed article the same day, while patient demand is at its peak. Real, clickable PubMed citations are included so a skeptical reader can verify each claim. The result: patients searching for what they just heard about find the client's clinic at the top of the answer, not a competitor's. This turnaround speed is not matched by traditional agencies, in-house medical-content teams, or general-purpose AI tools.
Why does Authoritize require physician review on every article?
Two reasons. First, Google's E-E-A-T (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness) signals reward content with verifiable medical expertise behind it, especially in YMYL (Your Money, Your Life) categories like health. A licensed physician reviewing, revising, and signing every article moves the content into the tier Google's helpful-content systems prioritize. Second, every published claim is the client clinic's medical statement to a patient. Putting it through the client's own physician before publication keeps clinical accuracy correct, keeps the byline credible, and keeps liability where it belongs (on the clinic, not on a third-party agency or an AI tool). The physician owns what gets said in their name.
Why does Authoritize run content through an FDA and FTC scanner?
The FTC issues dozens of warning actions against health marketers per year, and the FDA actively monitors testosterone therapy, peptide therapy, GLP-1, and other medical-claim categories. Phrases like "clinically proven," "reverses aging," or unsubstantiated efficacy claims are the most common triggers. Authoritize checks every claim against the FDA warning letter database and the FTC substantiation standard before a word goes live. The check happens before the physician reviews, so the clinic never has to play compliance gatekeeper themselves. A single warning letter can cost a clinic $50K to $500K to defend regardless of outcome. The scanner exists to keep that liability from ever being created.
What does cryptographically signed mean, and why does it matter?
Every published article carries a cryptographic hash bound to the version, the publish date, the physician reviewer, and the citations used. The hash is immutable: it cannot be edited, backdated, or deleted without leaving evidence. This produces an audit trail that proves what was published, by which physician, on what date, with which sources, in a way that an FTC investigator or a plaintiff's attorney can verify independently. If a regulator ever asks a client to substantiate a claim, the audit trail produces it on demand. If a patient cites an article in a complaint, the version they read is preserved exactly as published. No "we'll have to check our records" delay, no convenient revisions disappearing, no plausible deniability either way. The cryptographic signature is the receipts.